Commander Clueless Strikes Again
Hegseth’s ego-driven “leadership” proves dangerous, absurd, and illegal, forcing Washington to confront the man treating national security like a reckless stunt.
Guest article by Michael Cohen. Remember to follow him on Substack for more by clicking here. Michael is also racing to 500K followers on YouTube! Subscribe today for free here.
It’s becoming a weekly ritual in Washington: wake up, pour the coffee, check the news, and discover that Pete Hegseth has once again done something that isn’t just dumb, but aggressively, flamboyantly illegal. Not questionable, not sloppy; illegal. This isn’t your routine bureaucratic blunder. This is full-contact stupidity with a side of federal criminal exposure. And just when you think Hegseth has reached his personal ceiling of recklessness, he somehow finds a trapdoor, opens it, and swan-dives into a new subterranean chamber of idiocy.
The man’s résumé of disasters is already longer than an aircraft carrier, starting with Signalgate 1: when he treated encrypted military communications like they were Instagram DMs and sent classified operational chatter over unsecured channels because, in his words, it was “faster.” Fast isn’t the word the Pentagon used. They preferred terms like “reckless,” “dangerous,” and my personal favorite, “catastrophically unacceptable.” Then came Signalgate 2, the sequel nobody wanted, where he essentially committed the same offense but with even greater confidence, as though the lesson he took from the first investigation was that he hadn’t gone big enough.
There was also the unforgettable episode where he lectured admirals and generals—people who’ve commanded fleets, earned medals, and lived through things that would send Pete into a fainting spell—on how to run military operations. Imagine a guy who once spilled nacho cheese on his uniform at a tailgate telling Admiral Nimitz how the Pacific campaign “should’ve been done.” The Joint Chiefs have endured a lot in their careers, but being talked down to by a man whose strategic lens comes from cable news hits a special kind of nerve.
But all of that was merely the prelude to Hegseth’s latest and most alarming spectacle: ordering a missile strike so lethal, so sloppy, and so bizarrely vindictive that even members of his own party are choking on the details. A Venezuelan vessel suspected of drug trafficking? Fine; that’s what interdiction forces exist for. But blowing up the ship and then, according to multiple reports, allegedly green-lighting a second strike to eliminate two survivors clinging to debris? That’s not defense policy. That’s a deleted scene from a D-movie where the villain goes too far and the director mutters, “Yeah… we can’t release that.”
What makes it worse—and there is always a “worse” with Pete—is that this command wasn’t issued through careful deliberation or a structured chain of review. No, apparently it was spoken out loud, in the moment, in the same tone a frat boy might use to shout “send it!” before launching himself off a roof into a kiddie pool. And like all dangerous idiots, Hegseth assumes he’ll be protected by the same arrogance that led him to issue the order in the first place.
The man’s response to the scandal speaks volumes. Instead of expressing concern for the nearly 100 dead, or acknowledging the seriousness, or even feigning adult-level awareness of international law, he began posting AI-generated images mocking the entire situation. Because nothing says “I take this seriously” like using artificial intelligence to create memes about missile strikes. It’s the moral equivalent of a teenager doing Fortnite dances at a crime scene.
Meanwhile, congressional committees are gearing up for investigations with a level of intensity typically reserved for corrupt defense contractors and rogue intelligence operations. Democrats are using phrases like “illegal under international law,” while Republicans—yes, even Republicans—are saying if the reports are accurate, then Pete’s actions were beyond the pale. When bipartisan agreement materializes this quickly, it’s never about something good. It’s because the stink is so potent that nobody wants it near them.
Even the White House’s response is conspicuously frail. Usually, when one of their own is under fire, the reflex is unified defiance: deny, mock, deflect, rinse, repeat. But this time the tone is curiously soft, the distancing obvious, the support tepid at best. When a president who normally defends his appointees with flamethrower enthusiasm starts offering comments that sound like he’s hiding behind a curtain, you know the loyalty well is running dry.
Hegseth, though, marches on with his trademark mix of unwarranted bravado and cartoonish self-certainty. He insists everything was justified, everything was legal, and everything was necessary. He speaks like a man who confuses decisiveness with brutality and believes that sounding tough is the same thing as being competent. But there is a difference—a vast, canyon-sized difference—between strength and stupidity. And Pete, bless his misguided heart, keeps sprinting in the wrong direction with a hand grenade in each hand and no idea where the safety pin is.
At some point, even his defenders will have to ask the question everyone else is already thinking: why is a man who can’t handle a Signal thread without sparking a congressional inquiry in charge of lethal military decisions? How many more disasters does he get before someone in authority realizes that the biggest national security threat might be sitting in the Pentagon’s E-Ring wearing too much hair gel and barking orders like a discount action-movie villain?
Because if this is the pattern—if this is the level of judgment steering America’s war machine—then the danger isn’t coming from hostile nations abroad. It’s coming from the guy who treats war like it’s a playground dare, consequences be damned.
And the worst part?
Pete still thinks he’s the hero of this story.
HELP ME TO GROW THIS COMMUNITY… I’M COUNTING ON YOU!
PLEASE SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISTS…
SUBSCRIBE. READ. LIKE. RESTACK.
Yeah, I know; you’re tired. This shit is exhausting.
Guess what? Me too.
But I’ve spent the last 8 years throwing punches in the dark so truth could get a little daylight. And now I’m asking you to step into the ring with me.
Because if you’re still reading this, you already get it:
This isn’t just a newsletter. It’s a rally cry. A war drum. A line in the sand.
We are not passive observers of the downfall. We are the resistance. We call out the liars. We drag corruption by the collar into the sunlight. We say the quiet parts out loud; and we don’t flinch.
But here’s the truth: I can’t do this solo. Not anymore.
The storm is already here. We are standing in it. And it’s wearing stars and stripes like camouflage, preaching “freedom” while it sells fascism at retail.
So let me ask you:
Are. You. In?
Because this is not a scroll-and-forget read. This is a living, breathing, fire-breathing movement; and movements don’t move unless you do.
We need to be louder than spin, tougher than propaganda, and impossible to gaslight.
That takes more than clicks. More than likes.
It takes skin in the game.
So if you believe truth matters—if you’re sick of the bullshit, if you’re ready to stop screaming into the algorithm and start pushing back with purpose—this is your next step.
HERE’S HOW YOU PUT YOUR FOOT ON THE GAS:
Become a paid subscriber. Fund fearless, unfiltered journalism that hits back.
Share this with the loudest people you know; the ones who never sit down and shut up.
Build the community. Amplify the message. Be the damn megaphone.
And yeah; Founding Members? The first 240 of you will get a signed, numbered, limited-edition Substack version of Revenge. That’s not just a collector’s item. That’s receipts. Proof you didn’t sit this one out.
But let’s be clear:
This isn’t about a book.
It’s about backbone.
It’s about calling out the gaslighters and refusing to be played.
It’s about locking arms and saying, “Not. On. Our. Watch.”
You want to make a difference?
Then make it—right now.
Because if we don’t fight for truth, no one will.
But if we fight together?
They can’t drown us out.
Let’s be so loud, they wish we were just angry tweets.
Let’s be unshakable.
Unignorable.
Un-fucking-breakable.
Let’s go!







Again, this is on the GOP Senators that confirmed him knowing FULL WELL he was woefully UNQUALIFIED. They need to be held accountable for this as much as Hegseth. They are incriminated in this fiasco because THEY FAILED IN THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL DUTIES!
Ben, maybe you can answer a question for all America. If the now House of Putin is turned Blue before November 2026, will they have the power to go after the Goebbels of the Department of War America, Hegseth, and charge him with War Crimes. Demented Don has illegal immunity and will throw all his
Administration under the bus, see Ice Barbie and El Salvador, and they will not have immunity. America needs to hear to give us a sense that the Rule of Law will happen this time.
The Reality of the Defense In the actual Nuremberg trials, the defendants did employ variations of two main defenses: "I was just following orders" (the Befehl ist Befehl or "an order is an order" defense). This "superior orders" defense was broadly rejected by the tribunal. The judges held that individuals are still responsible for their actions when those orders are illegal or violate international law. A claim of general ignorance about the full extent of the atrocities, particularly the mass exterminations of Jews and other civilians. The real-world legal principle established was that following an unlawful order is not a valid defense against war crimes, as individuals have a moral and legal duty to refuse such orders. The court determined that many high-ranking officials were aware of the crimes and could have refused to participate without fear of execution themselves, often simply by requesting different assignments
Seventy-nine years ago this autumn, a US Supreme Court Justice named Robert Jackson, the US chief prosecutor at the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, began his opening statement with these magnificent words:
The privilege of opening the first trial in history for crimes against the peace of the world imposes a grave responsibility. The wrongs which we seek to condemn and punish have been so calculated, so malignant, and so devastating, that civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored, because it cannot survive their being repeated. That four great nations, flushed with victory and stung with injury stay the hand of vengeance and voluntarily submit their captive enemies to the judgment of the law is one of the most significant tributes that Power has ever paid to Reason.
What makes this inquest significant is that these prisoners represent sinister influences that will lurk in the world long after their bodies have returned to dust. We will show them to be living symbols of racial hatreds, of terrorism and violence, and of the arrogance and cruelty of power. They are symbols of fierce nationalisms and of militarism, of intrigue and war-making which have embroiled Europe generation after generation, crushing its manhood, destroying its homes, and impoverishing its life…. Civilization can afford no compromise with the social forces which would gain renewed strength if we deal ambiguously or indecisively with the men in whom those forces now precariously survive.
These words matter a great deal in this moment of boiling insanity, during which Holocaust deniers, revanchist Nazis, conspiracists, bigots and religious fanatics, who preach a gospel of political domination, sit together under a MAGA flag with iron devotion to their leader.
Kill them all.
— Pete Hegseth, ‘Secretary of War,’ September 2025
Imagine a Venezuelan village next to a drug lab in the jungle. Imagine something going wrong.
Imagine Pete Hegseth giving the order to wipe out the village:
Kill them all.
Imagine the order being given on an American street corner to a 20-year-old marine:
Kill them all.
Shall we pretend such things have not happened before, including in America?
Eighty-five years ago, the western powers, which included England and France, allowed Adolf Hitler to carve up a European country in the middle of the continent.
Today, it is Donald Trump playing the role of appeaser, demanding that Ukraine submit to aggression by a tyrant already preparing his next conquests. The Witkoff-Kushner pact is every bit as pernicious as the Molotov-Ribbentrop act with one main difference: it is far more materially corrupt and constructed around self-enrichment schemes by Trump and his oligarchs, working in partnership with Putin and his.
Churchill was right, just as today, it has been Trump’s most steadfast and honest critics who have been right about the situation that is accelerating in danger for free people everywhere. A rising tide of malice, hate, and extremism boiling for 10 years time has intersected with a deep American derangement at a moment when Trump is spiraling out of control psychologically and physically.