0:00
/
Transcript

Donald Trump wants $1.5T of your money for Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon, and they don’t want to tell you why.

There’s a cone of silence over the Pentagon and Hegseth is squelching media coverage of Trump’s war with Iran. New from Meidas Defense.

By Joe Plenzler

In the labyrinthine halls of the Pentagon, there was once a tradition as old as the building itself: the presence of a free and inquisitive press. For decades, journalists walked the same corridors as generals, building the kind of face-to-face rapport that transforms abstract defense policy into a story American taxpaying citizens can understand. For decades, our military leaders understood that they can’t win strategically without the support of the American people and that the channel to reach them was through the press. The press also understood that to have stories to tell, they needed to cultivate relationships and sources with people inside the military. All of this was a symbiotic relationship, although tenuous and often adversarial, for the benefit of keeping the American people informed. And our founders knew that a have a healthy, well-functioning democratic republic, needed a well-educated and well-informed public so the people could know who they wanted to choose to lead them. But today, Trump and Hegseth are doing their best to dismantle all of this.

As Atlantic correspondent Nancy Youssef recently discussed on the Meidas Defense podcast, the Pentagon Press Corps was effectively evicted from the building in October. This isn’t just a matter of office space or convenience; it is a fundamental breakdown in democratic accountability at a time when the Department of Defense is managing nearly a trillion dollars in taxpayer money and engaging in increasingly complex global conflicts like the war with Iran.

The Death of Nuance

For the American public, the loss of press access inside the Pentagon means a loss of sensory detail and truth. Youssef, a veteran of front-line reporting in Iraq and Afghanistan, points out that being in the building allowed reporters to “feel” the climate—to see the faces of leaders after a tragedy like the Abbey Gate bombing or to gauge the tension before a major strike.

Without this access, the public is left with sanitized, assigned-seat briefings and Hegseth “stat-padding” from the podium. When leaders brag about destroying 400 missile storage facilities without providing a denominator—is that 400 out of 500 or 5,000?—they aren’t informing the public; they are managing a narrative to their personal advantage. They aren’t telling the American people the full story.

A Climate of Fear

Perhaps most alarming is the reported “climate of fear” currently permeating the senior ranks of the military. With 21 admirals and generals fired recently, often without explanation, military leaders are reportedly hesitant to provide their best, unvarnished military advice. When the uniformed personnel are afraid to push back, and the press is barred from the room, the result is a closed-loop system where politics overrides reality.

This echo chamber has real-world consequences. Current reporting suggests that President Trump may not be receiving a full or accurate picture of the war in Iran, particularly regarding munitions stockpiles and the long-term effectiveness of strikes. When information is filtered through a small “coterie” of advisors rather than a robust, transparent process, the risk of strategic failure skyrockets. Even Vice President J.D. Vance is raising the issue and questioning Hegseth’s accuracy in briefing Trump. (See Nancy Youssef’s recent article The Pentagon May Not Be Telling Trump the Full Picture About The War.)

The Fiduciary Duty to the Public

The Department of Defense has a fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders: the American people. You and I, dear reader, are paying for these wars not just with $600 a year in additional taxes per person, but also at the gas pump and the grocery store every freakin day. We deserve to know if our trillion-dollar investments in conventional platforms like aircraft carriers and stealth bombers are actually effective against the asymmetric, $20,000 drones of our adversaries.

Trust in the military is declining, and secrecy only accelerates that rot. If the war is “going great,” as leadership often claims, the solution is simple: let us see it by embedding reporters with military units deployed to the Persian Gulf. Let them talk to the pilots conducting the strikes, the logisticians moving beans, bullets and band aids throughout the area of operations, and the Patriot ground crews who have been on the receiving ends of drone and missile attacks and tried to defend them. The bottom line: transparency isn’t a threat to national security; it is the bedrock of it. Without an informed public, there can be no sustained support for national strategy. It’s time the Pentagon let the light back in. We the People deserve the whole truth and the full story.

Meidas+ is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Give a gift subscription

Discussion about this video

User's avatar

Ready for more?