Please critique and, if you concur, promote what I call the "Presidential Crimes Act."
Simply, the Act would establish the principle that a President is NOT IMMUNE from being held immediately accountable by the SAME Statutes that apply to EVERY OTHER US CITIZEN or FOREIGN NATIONAL.
The Act would entail a President, once indicted, would take a leave of absence until a verdict is rendered by a trial jury. Resigning from Office would not protect an indicted President from prosecution.
The VP would assume the duties of the President during that interval.
Impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors would remain the Constitutional Obligation of the Congress.
The other key element of the Presidential Crimes Act would be to establish the Department of Justice (DOJ) as an INDEPENDENT entity.
All Senior members of the DOJ would be Nominated by an Independent Bipartisan Commission comprised of Legal Experts (aka "The DOJ Commission").
Terms of Service would, to the fullest extent possible, NOT be coincident with Presidential Terms of Office. Nominees would be Reviewed and Approved by a SUPER-MAJORITY of the US Senate.
The FBI Director & other Senior Appointees to the FBI would be similarly nominated by the Commission and Reviewed and Approved by the US Senate.
Neither the Leadership of the DOJ or the FBI would attend and otherwise participate in Presidential Cabinet Meetings and all contact with either the Executive, Legislative & Judicial Branches of the US Government would be transcribed and archived, immediately, with NARA. A Subcommittee of The DOJ Commission would have Oversight and Review Authority to ensure timely, accurate, and properly curated archival processes.
Am contacting them and others. My hope is that Ben and Michael discuss the proposal, here, and with all the stellar Constitutional Legal Experts that they know.
Yes, but it would be nice if Meidas did not lie in every title that the programs are "ad-free." There are always at least 2 or 3 ads in the middle of each of them for Popeks' private, for-profit law firm. That fits every definition of an advertisement.
If I have to look at an ad I don’t care because the news is the truth. They’re not lying about Trump’s dementia they’re not lying about the fraud. It appears to be. That’s the only place we can find. True news is on the services here I’ll take a couple ads for the truth.
Off the subject a bit, I saw that the deported Koreans at that Hyundai plant have resulted in complete work stoppage on that battery plant construction which will delay the creation of 8,500 jobs. That battery plant in GA was a direct result of Bidens bill too which is ironic. Katie Phang did a remarkable story on this subject and there are repercussions within the Korean government and other projects that have been stopped as well due to US ICE policies.
Evidence, please? He's not very popular with young women of any color (with good reason), and he's less popular with young Latinos (and Latinos in general) than he apparently was before the 2024 election -- again, for good reason. If by "youths" you mean "young white men," please say so.
Why would I say that? I'm discussing voters between the ages of 18 and 21. The stats are out there. Trump was more popular than previous Republican presidential nominees. It boggles my mind that anyone would vote for him much less females and POC's, but they DID.
The level of corruption in this regime is staggering. As always, thank you Meidas!
"At Levels Never Seen Before"
Donald J Trump
Too many times to count
Many people are saying...
😂
Ha ha ha ha ha you take a single comment and make it into a fact.
Trump is an ugly dictator
He reminds me of 'The Mummy.'
with a spray tan.
But mummy looked better!
Those sexy bandages! 🤕
I wouldn't give him that much credit.
You're way too kind, Marie........!
Love it... the Republican Judge says., "don't throw this trash in my court room..." Why not just Dump Dt in the trash too.
Make one trip,grab miller and regime!
Aww heck,get a dumpster, guys will empty and return!!!
Hey, I'll be the Dumpster DRIVER!
Ill pay for the dumpster and drive the truck. (Retired school bus driver)
He and the rest of the administration are toxic waste. You really want to mix that in with the ordinary garbage?
Good one... how about space?
Great idea rumpies on top of list now!!!!
Every single day I become sicker of the felon and his cronies. They are a bunch of crooks and need to be stopped.
Good Afternoon! So glad to catch you live. Keep fighting for America.
Patel should go back to creating more coloring books about his King and ruler
Let him crawl back under the rock he came from. incompetent creep.
So true. Glorious Statement.
Such upper level and insightful intelligent, thoughtful comments! LOL
Pile extra big rocks on top!
Thank you Ben & Michael!
Please critique and, if you concur, promote what I call the "Presidential Crimes Act."
Simply, the Act would establish the principle that a President is NOT IMMUNE from being held immediately accountable by the SAME Statutes that apply to EVERY OTHER US CITIZEN or FOREIGN NATIONAL.
The Act would entail a President, once indicted, would take a leave of absence until a verdict is rendered by a trial jury. Resigning from Office would not protect an indicted President from prosecution.
The VP would assume the duties of the President during that interval.
Impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors would remain the Constitutional Obligation of the Congress.
The other key element of the Presidential Crimes Act would be to establish the Department of Justice (DOJ) as an INDEPENDENT entity.
All Senior members of the DOJ would be Nominated by an Independent Bipartisan Commission comprised of Legal Experts (aka "The DOJ Commission").
Terms of Service would, to the fullest extent possible, NOT be coincident with Presidential Terms of Office. Nominees would be Reviewed and Approved by a SUPER-MAJORITY of the US Senate.
The FBI Director & other Senior Appointees to the FBI would be similarly nominated by the Commission and Reviewed and Approved by the US Senate.
Neither the Leadership of the DOJ or the FBI would attend and otherwise participate in Presidential Cabinet Meetings and all contact with either the Executive, Legislative & Judicial Branches of the US Government would be transcribed and archived, immediately, with NARA. A Subcommittee of The DOJ Commission would have Oversight and Review Authority to ensure timely, accurate, and properly curated archival processes.
Well said and proposed. When sanity returns to the White House, Congress and the Senet, let's get your proposal into Federal law.
Did you send this to your representatives? Even if they're R's?
Am contacting them and others. My hope is that Ben and Michael discuss the proposal, here, and with all the stellar Constitutional Legal Experts that they know.
Thank you for your response, Mary.
Keep it coming keeping us informed
Yes, but it would be nice if Meidas did not lie in every title that the programs are "ad-free." There are always at least 2 or 3 ads in the middle of each of them for Popeks' private, for-profit law firm. That fits every definition of an advertisement.
If I have to look at an ad I don’t care because the news is the truth. They’re not lying about Trump’s dementia they’re not lying about the fraud. It appears to be. That’s the only place we can find. True news is on the services here I’ll take a couple ads for the truth.
Off the subject a bit, I saw that the deported Koreans at that Hyundai plant have resulted in complete work stoppage on that battery plant construction which will delay the creation of 8,500 jobs. That battery plant in GA was a direct result of Bidens bill too which is ironic. Katie Phang did a remarkable story on this subject and there are repercussions within the Korean government and other projects that have been stopped as well due to US ICE policies.
A bit of hope, my stomach churns every day when I consider those who are younger and will have to live this sh*t
Trump was very popular with youths. They will learn about the consequences of their choices. Thus bizarre world is the only one they know.
Evidence, please? He's not very popular with young women of any color (with good reason), and he's less popular with young Latinos (and Latinos in general) than he apparently was before the 2024 election -- again, for good reason. If by "youths" you mean "young white men," please say so.
Why would I say that? I'm discussing voters between the ages of 18 and 21. The stats are out there. Trump was more popular than previous Republican presidential nominees. It boggles my mind that anyone would vote for him much less females and POC's, but they DID.
so it was ok for Fox saying kill em... euthanize em... fire that mutherfuker
This is FASCISM
Thank you, Meidas, for the encouraging information. Meidas is fighting the good fight!
Thank you Meidas Touch for all that you do!!!!!
Remember when the demonstrations used leaf blowers to deflect tear gas.
Accountablity is what makes a sociedad civalized 💯