Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sher''s avatar

He will surrender in the end and call it something else. There's immense pressure on him from several significant countries telling him to cease and desist. The economic impact of what has gone on already hasn't fully hit us yet...

Larry's avatar

There are such things as tactical victories coupled with strategic defeats. I will give two examples.

1. The Battle of the Coral Sea, 4-8 May , 1942. Here the Japanese won a tactical victory in that the IJN sank the fleet carrier USS Lexington CV-3 and lost the light carrier IJN Shoho. However the Japanese were thwarted in their plan to occupy Port Moresby so their strategic objective was not realized.

2. Viet Nam 1961-1975. Here, the US fought a war against a decidedly weaker foe and at nearly every turn were the tactical victors of battles. Yet the strategic aim of the US, mainly preventing South Viet Nam from falling under communist rule was never realized as the communist North Viet Nam eventually unified the country in April of 1975.

The United States has suffered a grievous strategic defeat in the three months of fighting in Iran, despite overwhelming tactical success. Iran is stronger domestically in that the ruling Mullahs have consolidated their power and United the country against the US and Israel who have actually demonstrated to the Iranian people that the US and Israel will bomb them just like their government has been telling them. Additionally Iran has acquired a new weapon, the ability to control the flow of more than 20% of the world’s oil by its ability to control the Strait of Hormuz. Now it seems the position of trump and his underlings is that we will pay Iran for the luxury of losing this war.

I guess this is what you get when you are led by a reality TV star who has failed at everything meaningful in his life and his secretary of defense who was a weekend Fox News host with a drinking problem

103 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?