No, let's rename it to The Fox Propaganda Network. After all, it is state-sponsored by the GOP and the Trump band of fools. Let's get real and call a spade, a spade!
It is a another way of saying fake/faux Like a phony item sold as real on EBAY or other websites that sell things as real items of value and they say that they are FAUX and most people are not aware of the disclaimer.
DatGuy Ovuhdare knows how to spell FOX and how to spell FAUX. Furthermore, it seemed perfectly evident that HE UNDERSTOOD the MEANINGS. He was making a JOKE--a play on words, a linguistic joke, if you will.
It is but it’s not “catchy” and it is as close to “fake news” as it gets and that’s Trump’s saying. So FOX SKEWS is NEW and accurate. Now to make it go viral.
Eviscerate FOX. Deny them ad revenue by denying their ad buying company CEO and executives his annual bonuses. For example Wayfair. Boycott them for a full fiscal quarter. Get all the on line influencers to remind everyone every day for the entire quarter. See how fast CEO’s stop buying ads - do only ONE brand - do it implacably for an entire quarter. See how quickly you become the new sheriff in town and how fast other CEO’s quit buying ads.
See how fast FOX changes content. All they care about is money. That’s it. All of it. Money. Oh - and next generation FOX CEO will be a decent human being if you do this.
Better -- sue them when they defame you. Extremely vulnerable. $787.5M in largest ever defamation settlement with Dominion Voting Systems. Must face Smartmatic $2.7 billion defamation claim.
When you sue them, you get millions in free publicity.
Meanwhile Fox shareholder derivitive suit: Plaintiffs the New York City Funds and the State of Oregon in this shareholder derivative action against certain directors and officers of Fox Corporation. In connection with Fox News’ propagation of unfounded, defamatory conspiracy theories concerning the U.S. presidential election of 2020, the action alleges breach of fiduciary duties for: (1) the adoption of an illegal business model by which Fox News pursues profits by committing actionable defamation; (2) the lack of good faith efforts to establish systems or practices for minimizing, mitigating, or monitoring defamation risk; and (3) inaction in the face of red flags of defamation risk.
How is it that this is so little known to the outside world? There should be an ongoing discussion on how the Reps tried to spread impertinent lies to intimidate and infuriate voters.
If there ever is another election, this must be firm knowledge in the country or Trumpsky will claim election fraud again.
That’s a problem. The general public will lose focus and the boycott would be unsuccessful. Have no fear - ruin the bonus’ for one company and the rest will melt like a MAGA snowflake. All we want is to get FOX to modify content.
Great news, but do we still call it Fox “news” when it’s pure propaganda?
No, let's rename it to The Fox Propaganda Network. After all, it is state-sponsored by the GOP and the Trump band of fools. Let's get real and call a spade, a spade!
FOX SKEWS for short ; )
Love that FPN! Fox Propaganda Network
Foxaganda
It's best to call it what they called themselves in court (lawsuit they lost, for selling propaganda as "news"): FOX ENTERTAINMENT.
They're surely amusing their viewers to death...
Let’s start calling the shameless propagandists “FOX SKEWS.”
You misspelled Faux News
It is a another way of saying fake/faux Like a phony item sold as real on EBAY or other websites that sell things as real items of value and they say that they are FAUX and most people are not aware of the disclaimer.
DatGuy Ovuhdare knows how to spell FOX and how to spell FAUX. Furthermore, it seemed perfectly evident that HE UNDERSTOOD the MEANINGS. He was making a JOKE--a play on words, a linguistic joke, if you will.
I propose we call it what Ben does in his videos, 'the state run propaganda network known as Fox'
Wordy, sure, but it's hella accurate lmao.
Let's make it catch on haha
Foxaganda
I thought they had agreed to be called an entertainment network.
Didn’t their own lawyers claim they were an entertainment network and couldn’t be taken seriously as a new source?
Yeah, that's like claiming Elon Muskrat isn't in charge of DOGE aka Doggie Poop.
Faux News is more appropriate.
It is but it’s not “catchy” and it is as close to “fake news” as it gets and that’s Trump’s saying. So FOX SKEWS is NEW and accurate. Now to make it go viral.
The term as used during the Dominion trial was fox opinion media (or something like that).
Want to marginalize them? The strategy to overcome Trimp/Musk/Fox is laid out in Feathers of Hope -- Jerry Weiss.
https://jerryweiss.substack.com/
Eviscerate FOX. Deny them ad revenue by denying their ad buying company CEO and executives his annual bonuses. For example Wayfair. Boycott them for a full fiscal quarter. Get all the on line influencers to remind everyone every day for the entire quarter. See how fast CEO’s stop buying ads - do only ONE brand - do it implacably for an entire quarter. See how quickly you become the new sheriff in town and how fast other CEO’s quit buying ads.
See how fast FOX changes content. All they care about is money. That’s it. All of it. Money. Oh - and next generation FOX CEO will be a decent human being if you do this.
Better -- sue them when they defame you. Extremely vulnerable. $787.5M in largest ever defamation settlement with Dominion Voting Systems. Must face Smartmatic $2.7 billion defamation claim.
When you sue them, you get millions in free publicity.
Meanwhile Fox shareholder derivitive suit: Plaintiffs the New York City Funds and the State of Oregon in this shareholder derivative action against certain directors and officers of Fox Corporation. In connection with Fox News’ propagation of unfounded, defamatory conspiracy theories concerning the U.S. presidential election of 2020, the action alleges breach of fiduciary duties for: (1) the adoption of an illegal business model by which Fox News pursues profits by committing actionable defamation; (2) the lack of good faith efforts to establish systems or practices for minimizing, mitigating, or monitoring defamation risk; and (3) inaction in the face of red flags of defamation risk.
BTW Newsmax had to pay $40 million to. Smartmatic
Daniel, excellent comment.
I had never thought of the points you made, so thanks.
How is it that this is so little known to the outside world? There should be an ongoing discussion on how the Reps tried to spread impertinent lies to intimidate and infuriate voters.
If there ever is another election, this must be firm knowledge in the country or Trumpsky will claim election fraud again.
Good one!
Fox has over 100 advertisers. We need to boycott them all. Call and email them til they listen. NY Post also. Anything rupert needs to feel the burn!
That’s a problem. The general public will lose focus and the boycott would be unsuccessful. Have no fear - ruin the bonus’ for one company and the rest will melt like a MAGA snowflake. All we want is to get FOX to modify content.
I'd prefer spontaneous combustion.
That’s a good option!!
😋 Yup!
We call it garbage.
I have always called them faux noise.
How about Fox Spews.
Fox has admitted that it is an entertainment network and not a news network.