As I asked above, where is your proof? Also, may I add, what were any funds received used for? If they were campaign contributions, that is perfectly legal. AIPAC is US based. Any other uses, you will have to document.
Now was that so hard? I will look at it and make my decision. Actually, I would need more than one point of contact, but if it looks like there is anything in it, I will explore further.
I guess from your note you don’t call that corruption,..
How did that get normalized in your mind?
The second highest receiver of AIPAC in Congress, I guess I should be impressed, huh?
As I asked above, where is your proof? Also, may I add, what were any funds received used for? If they were campaign contributions, that is perfectly legal. AIPAC is US based. Any other uses, you will have to document.
What is legal today and what is correct and right are two different things,.
https://youtu.be/WXSswzIMydw?si=NEPQNDY-8fSojGot
Let me know what you think after you watch this
Now was that so hard? I will look at it and make my decision. Actually, I would need more than one point of contact, but if it looks like there is anything in it, I will explore further.
So what do you say now?
https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/hakeem-jeffries/summary?cid=N00033640