Re: Walz / Vance debate. Do not think Vance is a fool. He is a trained and accomplished sophist. His opening comment was a non sequitur. Not challenged. Walz missed a golden opportunity, when in the later stages Vance raised the issue of censorship ( I presume the Facebook nonsense.) The answer there should have been a wholehearted, "Project 2025 is censorship!".
Re: Walz / Vance debate. Do not think Vance is a fool. He is a trained and accomplished sophist. His opening comment was a non sequitur. Not challenged. Walz missed a golden opportunity, when in the later stages Vance raised the issue of censorship ( I presume the Facebook nonsense.) The answer there should have been a wholehearted, "Project 2025 is censorship!".
Re: Walz / Vance debate. Do not think Vance is a fool. He is a trained and accomplished sophist. His opening comment was a non sequitur. Not challenged. Walz missed a golden opportunity, when in the later stages Vance raised the issue of censorship ( I presume the Facebook nonsense.) The answer there should have been a wholehearted, "Project 2025 is censorship!".