155 Comments
User's avatar
drbilldean@gmail.com's avatar

2024 Election Subversion

Kathi Griffin and Don Lemon on his Substack show speculated that the Nazis rigged the 2024 election This conjecture is now beginning to gain traction as objective data supports concerns about the election results

It’s obvious that there was a lot riding on the election since the Orange Cheeto was running to keep his ass out of jail As we know now Cheeto will do anything to survive even if it means defrauding the American people in order to stay out of the hoosegow

First it was Greg Pallast investigative reporting of vigilante challenges to registered voters in order to disenfranchise 3.5M voters from voting that would have brought a win for Harris

Now the Election Truth Alliance(ETA) has shed even more light on election integrity with a sophisticated statistical deep dive into 2024 election These include how the Nazis were able to win all seven swing states which is a rare phenomenon Plotting out the precincts in swing states there is a consistent “comet effect” demonstrating voter data manipulation particularly on the day of the election This kind of graphic effect is seen in evaluation of Russian elections This coupled with Musk’s group expertise in hacking into Fed computer systems, it doesn’t take too much to suggest that vote tabulation tampering occurred

The Nazis should not be allowed to hold public office for at least 6y!!! Join the NO Kings June 14 Protest Keep the pressure on the fascists in government

Expand full comment
RJM's avatar

Not to mention Trump admitting at his pre-inauguration rally on Jan 19 that Musk had hacked the voting computers and thus Trump won Pennsylvania. (And only a very naive person would think Pennsylvania was the only state that was affected.) Rep. Jasmine Crockett noticed, nj.com printed the story, rev.com has the transcript, but still too many people aren't aware of it, alas. Links:

https://www.nj.com/politics/2025/01/house-dem-questions-whether-trump-maga-billionaire-rigged-election-in-critical-swing-state.html

https://www.rev.com/transcripts/trump-rally-ahead-of-inaguration (time stamp 28:03)

Quote: "But [Musk] went out to Pennsylvania ... and he knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers, those vote-counting computers, and we ended up

winning Pennsylvania in a landslide. So it was pretty good. He's pretty good. So thank you to Elon."

Not a landslide [there you go again dissing the truth, Dodo] but also not what actual voters voted for.

Expand full comment
drbilldean@gmail.com's avatar

thanks so much for the added information which is gradually accumulating and by the end of the year it will be a mountain that the Nazis will have to counter It will be a very interesting time for sure

Expand full comment
Leah Baum's avatar

Kdw is a troll freak spewing disinformation saying the government is poisoning our food. Sounds like a paranoid maggot.

Reported and blocked.

Expand full comment
Edie Sadowski's avatar

Is anyone investigating the election results in the swing states?

Expand full comment
Linda Cocuzzi Richter's avatar

It's true the Democrats are resisting this as he says. When I first heard that I pulled back on my research on this. Then I thought, I know they don't want the hassle but they have to speak out. They cannot let this go by. Then it'll just happen again. SMART elections brought a case against Trump in Rockland county NY because of evidence, the interruption in the data pattern. And while Kirsten Gillibrand was reelected there, Kamala Harris got NO votes! The NY State supreme Court said there's enough evidence to move forward. Next court date is September 25. It was also in the Boulder Daily. But I hear that even if he's guilty, the election was certified and it can't be reversed. I'd like to know who said? This never happened before!!

Expand full comment
RJM's avatar

The short answer is NO although a newer substack, Smart Elections, has been compiling the evidence. Maybe that, and the pile of unimaginable horrors that gets bigger and stinkier every day, will make people listen.

Historicall, as I see it, the Greed Party's continual assertions of election fraud (based on flimsy to zero evidence) convinced the Democrats that their position had to be that there was no election fraud anywhere at all ever. The statement "the election is rigged" at the 2016 debate was misinterpreted as an accusation with Democrats getting all defensive, when anyone who considered the source would take it for an admission that the rigging was being done for him because he can't think about anything that's not of personal interest.

After last November's election a group of computer scientists wrote a letter concerning anomalies in the tabulated votes that suggested substantial hacking but their ideas were ignored. So far, Democrats seem to be continuing to run away from the issue. It's disappointing (big understatement).

Expand full comment
Linda Cocuzzi Richter's avatar

Yes, you can visit SMART elections or Election Truth Alliance websites. Also I wrote a Substack in April called "2024 Election: call for audits?", you can see what the evidence looks like in Nevada and Pennsylvania, initially.

Expand full comment
RandomHuman's avatar

https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1jubiil/cmv_the_2024_election_could_have_been_stolen_and/

1. Trump’s Own Statements

On January 19, 2025, during a pre-inauguration rally in Washington, D.C., Donald Trump expressed gratitude towards Elon Musk for his support during the campaign, particularly in Pennsylvania. He stated:

“He journeyed to Pennsylvania where he spent a month and a half campaigning for me… and he’s a popular guy. He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.”

Then during a FIFA World Cup announcement, Trump veered from soccer talk to politics when reflecting on how the United States secured hosting rights during his first administration. "When we made this, it was made during my term, my first term, and it was so sad because I said, can you imagine, I'm not going to be President, and that's too bad," Trump said. "And what happened is they rigged the election and I became President, so that was a good thing."

Sure, Donald Trump is an idiot and says incoherent stuff all the time, but two incidents and one directly referencing the “vote-counting computers” do seem extremely fishy, especially given the work of the Election Truth Alliance or ETA.

.

.

.

2. Clark County, NV

Let’s move on to Nevada. The Election Truth Alliance analyzed the Cast Vote Records (CVR) from Clark County, raw voting machine data publicly available, and found multiple quantitative anomalies that demand answers.

a. Drop-Off Voting Discrepancy:

A “drop-off vote” is when someone votes for president but skips down-ballot races. This is normal, but here’s the twist:

• Trump had a +10.54% drop-off rate.

• Harris had just +1.07%.

That’s a 10X discrepancy. Why would Trump voters overwhelmingly skip Senate races but

Harris voters didn’t? That’s not just odd, it’s statistically glaring and does not line up with past trends from other swing states. In fact, in Pennsylvania in 2024, the drop-off rate was around 5% for Republicans, and in 2012, during the Obama v. Romney campaign, the drop-off was 6% for republicans. In other words, 10% is wildly high.

b. Early Voting Tabulator Anomalies:

In early voting, the more ballots a tabulator processed, the more predictably skewed the results became:

• At tabulators with <250 ballots, Trump and Harris showed reasonable variance.

• But above 250 ballots, results converged tightly around Trump 60%, Harris 40%, across the board.

.

.

.

3. Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania is where historical voting patterns were flipped on their head, and no one seems to be asking why.

Traditionally, urban centers like Philadelphia vote Democrat, and rural counties lean Republican, but in 2024, heavily Democrat precincts saw abnormally low turnout, while swing counties reported turnout higher than registered voter levels in some cases.

ETA flagged precincts where:

• Ballots cast exceeded 100% of registered voters.

• Votes for Trump outnumbered total ballots submitted, based on county reporting timelines.

• Tabulation errors were “corrected” days later with no audit trail.

.

.

.

Expand full comment
Susanna J. Sturgis's avatar

Trump is a congenital liar. Why is it that so many people are sure he's telling the truth when he says something they want to believe?

Expand full comment
RJM's avatar

Which people? Those of us who believed him when he said in 2016 “the election is rigged” and when on 1/19/25 he linked Musk’s being good with vote counting computers to his winning PA’s electoral votes? Or is it those who believe his claiming to have won Pennsylvania by a landslide? I hope the latter!

Expand full comment
Sylvia Arrowood's avatar

Even someone like me knew there was election interference but no one wanted to look into it. And why not? That is what I want to know. Now looking into the election interference especially with TACO and Musk admitting to it is moving very slowly.

Expand full comment
sbchica's avatar

I knew when the orange asshole was so cavalier in his screw-ups during his nazi rallies, that he KNEW he was going to win. The press or his minions didn't even try to cover up for his most ridiculous rants, or when he was slurring, or just plain acting a fool. He strutted around like he just KNEW he was going to win. But that of course, wasn't enough, so he added a couple of fake assassination attempts and one young kid lost his life and took it for the team.

Expand full comment
T L Mills's avatar

An adult firefighter with a family was shot by that 'young kid', as well.

Expand full comment
drbilldean@gmail.com's avatar

Cheeto claimed interference when there was no substantiation of the claim It takes time to objectively review the data and statistically analyze the information b4 going off half cocked It's now becoming clear that the Nazis were elected illegally Cases coming forward

Expand full comment
Bob Seemueller's avatar

The election was certified, Kamala Harris never asked for a recount and still hasn't.

Expand full comment
drbilldean@gmail.com's avatar

So what?

Expand full comment
Maryooch's avatar

We ALL felt that, I think, on election day. More of a gut-punch than when he "won" the first time around. There was nothing indicating that he could catch up to Kamala's trajectory. At least, from where I sit (in the cheap seats). And these comments RJM mentions, below, were crystal clear to many of us. "He just admitted to fixing the election!".

Expand full comment
drbilldean@gmail.com's avatar

From Cheeto's vantage point "one fix deserves another" especially if it kept him out of jail All his minions across the country given ways to affect the election The case that RandomHuman posted is an example moving forward of what is the first of more to come

Expand full comment
Edie Sadowski's avatar

Where do the lawsuits stand now?

Expand full comment
RJM's avatar

You ask all the right questions. Thank you. I hope someone will answer this one.

Expand full comment
Linda Cocuzzi Richter's avatar

SMART elections is gathering evidence and they go to court on September 22

Expand full comment
Rebecca Lovewell's avatar

Hello!

I see others have raised the SMART Elections case in Rockland County. While on its face that case seems to be about the Democratic primary race, the far more disturbing implications are what the company that’s supposed to be ensuring the integrity of our voting systems, Pro V&V, did with the machines prior to the 2024 election. In addition, Pro V&V’s public facing website is being dismantled - or something - and for one of two major companies responsible for nearly the whole American election apparatus to go dark immediately following the 2024 election is alarming, to say the least.

Our voting apparatus is controlled by only a couple of companies, and these companies have very little meaningful oversight or accountability.

Before the 2024 election, Pro V&V made changes to the voting machine/tabulator software, along with other seriously concerning activities, and they called the changes “di minimus,” which would not trigger any review by election overseers.

I didn’t write these two substack articles below, but they are part of my research on the issue. I’ve been following the work of both the Election Truth Alliance and SMART Elections quite closely and just discovered this Pro V&V thing a couple of days ago.

Perhaps these resources about Pro V&V and other problems related to the 2024 elections (and potential rigging) will be of interest to everyone else who is concerned about the integrity of our voting systems.

Here’s one from SMART about Pro V&V: https://smartelections.substack.com/p/voting-machine-testing-lab-website

And here’s one from another author who expands upon the ProV&V website scandal, along with other anomalies: https://dissentinbloom.substack.com/p/the-machines-were-changed-before

We have to get the word out to as many people as possible.

In solidarity, Rebecca

Expand full comment
Marlene Lerner-Bigley (CA)'s avatar

Yes, he’s always performative, the only thing he knows! Trump cannot exist without being the top MSM constant shameful news, even when his makeup is poorly put on his face.

Expand full comment
brad ziegel's avatar

Trump's goal is to install fear and provocation into people please don't violate the law and buy into his spider's web,Trump wants all eyes on his parade on June 14th,so he is threatening protests against his monarchy,don't become violent and exhibit only peaceful protests and if our media was on our side....no media would give any airtime to this disgusting use of tax dollars and self-agrandisement.Please stay alert and remember your power is in you obedience of the Constitution and state laws,tough times ahead but we can overcome with our hearts and minds.

Expand full comment
Bryan's avatar

We TRUE Americans MUST stop this gaslighting because mainstream media IS NOT DOING THEIR JOB and reporting what’s REALLY happening. We can’t let this 🤡 destroy our constitution and take away our right to PEACEFULLY PROTEST his illegal actions. Stay strong!!

Expand full comment
Elena Freshman Schumann's avatar

I am not sure what you mean by TRUE Americans. The people who are citizens or legal residents have the right to be in this country. The people who do not fit into either category do NOT have the right to be in this country. That is the issue.

Expand full comment
Bryan's avatar

TRUE Americans are those willing to defend the Constitution. American Citizens are peacefully protesting which is their first amendment right by the Constitution! Sending troops and national guard to stop this is illegal! I said NOTHING about immigrants.

Expand full comment
Elena Freshman Schumann's avatar

I just wanted clarification of your position. I did not even use the word "immigrants". Why do you jump to conclusions that do not make sense? I do not want the National Guard to be used in this instance. I think I am on your side. Please think about what you want to say before you actually make a reply to what I am saying.

Expand full comment
Bryan's avatar

My comment was about the freedom to protest. You claimed the “issue” was people who aren’t citizens or legal residents, so that is the definition of immigrants. I did think about my response, please think about what you post before you actually respond. 🙄

Expand full comment
WJB Motown's avatar

June 14, more than ever before MUST be one of the biggest protests in history. Canadians are having solidarity actions so there are no excuses not to fill the streets to save democracy.

Expand full comment
Elena Freshman Schumann's avatar

I guess I misunderstood your comment. SORRY EXCUSE ME!! So what? I do not know why you are hostile just because I misunderstood your comment? You did mentioned the word "immigrants" first not me. An immigrant may or may not be entitled to be in this country, if the immigrant has the proper documentation from the proper authorities they can be in this country. I have no problem with that.

Expand full comment
Bryan's avatar

I didn’t mean to appear hostile, I was trying to clarify my comment. I also agree with legal immigration. I wish we had better policies to expedite the process for those who want to follow the law. We are on the same page. Have a great day.

Expand full comment
Elena Freshman Schumann's avatar

Got It! Thanks. Elena

Expand full comment
Terry's avatar

But they do have a constitutional right to due process. The felon rapist regime is acting outside of the law and is throwing away the constitution. If they are truly criminals give them their day in court like a civilized society, not a nazi regime.

Expand full comment
Marilyn's avatar

Everything he accuses the Dems of doing it actually he that does it.

I also don't believe he was shot once upon a time.

Expand full comment
Roberta Houle's avatar

Marion and Michelle. I agree. My very first response to the alleged shooting was that it was a theatrical distraction. If you can afford to pay millions and billions of dollars to your ‘friends,’ one of these friends can afford a sniper that would have gotten him first shot. But they think we really are that stupid that we will believe this .

All my support from a Canadian. 💪 🦋

Expand full comment
Linda Cocuzzi Richter's avatar

I agree, how could a 78yo man push his head and shoulders above the Secret Service, unless it was planned to allow him so he could raise his arm and get the photo op

Expand full comment
Roberta Houle's avatar

Exactly. The whole process beforehand in which the police and the Secret Services apparently miscommunicated, the crucial area of the sniper not being manned, and……….

There are too many give aways, imo. Oh but the MAGA hero worship after!!!!

Expand full comment
Michelle's avatar

He Wasn't shot Marilyn! J.D. was on a YouTube channel being interviewed and let slip that, "he, Drumpf, ALMOST took a bullet in Pennsylvania rally!"

Expand full comment
Marilyn's avatar

It all looked like it was made up. They are such liars and performers. Yeech.

Expand full comment
Linda Cocuzzi Richter's avatar

Cheeto always projects his thoughts or plans into other people

Expand full comment
Deborah Hemenway's avatar

It was like an arson sitting a fire and then claiming they are the only one that can put it. As Gavin said about the orange outrage, he is a stone cold liar. What is isn't and what isn't is. It was no more a riot or an insurrection but use those terms and the cult will be all agog. Thanks for this.

Expand full comment
Cathy's avatar

You hit the nail on the head! This is all about distraction. Jan 6 was the real insurrection. These protests are about free speech and unlawful detention.

Expand full comment
Kristin M. Cano's avatar

The state, counties, and cities of California employ more than 75,000 uniformed law-enforcement personnel with arrest powers. The Los Angeles Police Department alone numbers nearly 9,000 uniformed officers and the LA Sheriff has about 10,000 sworn officers. They can surely handle some dozens of agitators throwing rocks, shooting fireworks, and impeding vehicular traffic.

This doesn’t even bear a teeny tiny resemblance to the Rodney King riots.

If and when those 75,000 uniformed personnel feel overmatched by the agitators, California can request federal help of its own volition.

Remember, state’s rights and the 10th Amendment or does that only matter when the White House is occupied by a Democrat?

Expand full comment
M. Apodaca's avatar

It may well NOT be a distraction, but practice for when he loses the 2028 election. And more practice is in store, especially for Blue states.

Expand full comment
HarrisWalz FTW 2024's avatar

HE can't run in 2028. If he continues his current power grab at the same rate of speed as when he hit the ground running (clearly only a figure of speech in his case) on Jan. 20, we'll be lucky if there are elections in 2026, much less remotely free and fair ones. Congress has already let him usurp a large amount of their power, and the Rs are too chicken to demand it back. While there are still some judges who aren't in his pocket, he simply ignores what they say--including SCOTUS--and keeps on going.

Either we'll have a Constitutional election, in which case he won't be allowed to run for a third term, or he'll be walking around with a gold crown. If so, millions of us will have died by then and at least won't have to see it.

Expand full comment
Michelle's avatar

Elon is already reposting DJT shit and kissing his ass… it’s like two alcoholic parents…

Expand full comment
Michelle's avatar

Damn!😡

Expand full comment
Edie Sadowski's avatar

!@#$%&*!

Expand full comment
Tim Piotrowski's avatar

Very Well said Mr Cohen, and very insightful.

Expand full comment
Roberta Houle's avatar

Agreed. I always enjoy Mr. Cohen’s writings and truthful perspectives. And the humour.

Expand full comment
Edie Sadowski's avatar

Thank you, Mr. Cohen!

Expand full comment
J Cheng's avatar

I wonder what the army, national guard and ICE would do if people just stood there. No signs. No verbal comments, no sound. Just stand there and stare at them. What would they do? It's not against the law to stand somewhere.

Expand full comment
Karen Evans Quackenbush's avatar

That’s what should be happening, even with signs. Unfortunately not everyone does that which provides the excuse of ‘provocation’

Expand full comment
Janet Dieterle's avatar

Just remember: Trump likes to sing his own praises of how he won all the swing states in this last election. However,keep in mind that’s never happened before! Hmmmmm??? We’ve got work to do people! Stay strong. Stay safe. Be kind…even when it’s tough!💙💙💙

Expand full comment
Elena Freshman Schumann's avatar

The way we elect the President needs to be changed. That is a whole separate issue that no one seems to care about. If the way we elect the President was changed so that the Popular vote would decide who was President instead of "electors", then Trump would have lost in both elections. He won fair and square under our current rules, but that is our fault for no changing the rules which we can do by Constitutional Amendment.

Expand full comment
Edie Sadowski's avatar

Needed to get rid of the electoral college over a century ago

Expand full comment
Elena Freshman Schumann's avatar

I agree but the problem is that the lesser populated states have more power under the electoral college and they are the ones that have to agree to get rid of it which of course they will not do because it benefits them.

Expand full comment
Melissa Meg Lauber's avatar

Damn, Michael, you are a great writer! I love your phrasing and descriptions.

Expand full comment
Marisol Niebles's avatar

The TT lady who use to report with glasses I think she said only 300 of the national guard went it was peaceful and the cops where able to help in the pride parade . Not saying they were no problems but it looks like Trump didn’t get what he wanted idk

Expand full comment
Claire's avatar

Distraction may be Dump’s plan, but the Heritage Foundation plan is to overthrow the government and remake it into a Christo-fascist state where all power is concentrated in the president. And make no mistake-Dump is their puppet. He’s the loud, crude, stupid blowhard who’s providing the distraction while they do their dirty work.

Expand full comment
Edie Sadowski's avatar

And a POS

Expand full comment
Kristin M. Cano's avatar

Also, thank you for a succinct edition of the trump playbook.

Expand full comment