Kathi Griffin and Don Lemon on his Substack show speculated that the Nazis rigged the 2024 election This conjecture is now beginning to gain traction as objective data supports concerns about the election results
It’s obvious that there was a lot riding on the election since the Orange Cheeto was running to keep hi…
Kathi Griffin and Don Lemon on his Substack show speculated that the Nazis rigged the 2024 election This conjecture is now beginning to gain traction as objective data supports concerns about the election results
It’s obvious that there was a lot riding on the election since the Orange Cheeto was running to keep his ass out of jail As we know now Cheeto will do anything to survive even if it means defrauding the American people in order to stay out of the hoosegow
First it was Greg Pallast investigative reporting of vigilante challenges to registered voters in order to disenfranchise 3.5M voters from voting that would have brought a win for Harris
Now the Election Truth Alliance(ETA) has shed even more light on election integrity with a sophisticated statistical deep dive into 2024 election These include how the Nazis were able to win all seven swing states which is a rare phenomenon Plotting out the precincts in swing states there is a consistent “comet effect” demonstrating voter data manipulation particularly on the day of the election This kind of graphic effect is seen in evaluation of Russian elections This coupled with Musk’s group expertise in hacking into Fed computer systems, it doesn’t take too much to suggest that vote tabulation tampering occurred
The Nazis should not be allowed to hold public office for at least 6y!!! Join the NO Kings June 14 Protest Keep the pressure on the fascists in government
Not to mention Trump admitting at his pre-inauguration rally on Jan 19 that Musk had hacked the voting computers and thus Trump won Pennsylvania. (And only a very naive person would think Pennsylvania was the only state that was affected.) Rep. Jasmine Crockett noticed, nj.com printed the story, rev.com has the transcript, but still too many people aren't aware of it, alas. Links:
Quote: "But [Musk] went out to Pennsylvania ... and he knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers, those vote-counting computers, and we ended up
winning Pennsylvania in a landslide. So it was pretty good. He's pretty good. So thank you to Elon."
Not a landslide [there you go again dissing the truth, Dodo] but also not what actual voters voted for.
thanks so much for the added information which is gradually accumulating and by the end of the year it will be a mountain that the Nazis will have to counter It will be a very interesting time for sure
It's true the Democrats are resisting this as he says. When I first heard that I pulled back on my research on this. Then I thought, I know they don't want the hassle but they have to speak out. They cannot let this go by. Then it'll just happen again. SMART elections brought a case against Trump in Rockland county NY because of evidence, the interruption in the data pattern. And while Kirsten Gillibrand was reelected there, Kamala Harris got NO votes! The NY State supreme Court said there's enough evidence to move forward. Next court date is September 25. It was also in the Boulder Daily. But I hear that even if he's guilty, the election was certified and it can't be reversed. I'd like to know who said? This never happened before!!
The short answer is NO although a newer substack, Smart Elections, has been compiling the evidence. Maybe that, and the pile of unimaginable horrors that gets bigger and stinkier every day, will make people listen.
Historicall, as I see it, the Greed Party's continual assertions of election fraud (based on flimsy to zero evidence) convinced the Democrats that their position had to be that there was no election fraud anywhere at all ever. The statement "the election is rigged" at the 2016 debate was misinterpreted as an accusation with Democrats getting all defensive, when anyone who considered the source would take it for an admission that the rigging was being done for him because he can't think about anything that's not of personal interest.
After last November's election a group of computer scientists wrote a letter concerning anomalies in the tabulated votes that suggested substantial hacking but their ideas were ignored. So far, Democrats seem to be continuing to run away from the issue. It's disappointing (big understatement).
Yes, you can visit SMART elections or Election Truth Alliance websites. Also I wrote a Substack in April called "2024 Election: call for audits?", you can see what the evidence looks like in Nevada and Pennsylvania, initially.
On January 19, 2025, during a pre-inauguration rally in Washington, D.C., Donald Trump expressed gratitude towards Elon Musk for his support during the campaign, particularly in Pennsylvania. He stated:
“He journeyed to Pennsylvania where he spent a month and a half campaigning for me… and he’s a popular guy. He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.”
Then during a FIFA World Cup announcement, Trump veered from soccer talk to politics when reflecting on how the United States secured hosting rights during his first administration. "When we made this, it was made during my term, my first term, and it was so sad because I said, can you imagine, I'm not going to be President, and that's too bad," Trump said. "And what happened is they rigged the election and I became President, so that was a good thing."
Sure, Donald Trump is an idiot and says incoherent stuff all the time, but two incidents and one directly referencing the “vote-counting computers” do seem extremely fishy, especially given the work of the Election Truth Alliance or ETA.
.
.
.
2. Clark County, NV
Let’s move on to Nevada. The Election Truth Alliance analyzed the Cast Vote Records (CVR) from Clark County, raw voting machine data publicly available, and found multiple quantitative anomalies that demand answers.
a. Drop-Off Voting Discrepancy:
A “drop-off vote” is when someone votes for president but skips down-ballot races. This is normal, but here’s the twist:
• Trump had a +10.54% drop-off rate.
• Harris had just +1.07%.
That’s a 10X discrepancy. Why would Trump voters overwhelmingly skip Senate races but
Harris voters didn’t? That’s not just odd, it’s statistically glaring and does not line up with past trends from other swing states. In fact, in Pennsylvania in 2024, the drop-off rate was around 5% for Republicans, and in 2012, during the Obama v. Romney campaign, the drop-off was 6% for republicans. In other words, 10% is wildly high.
b. Early Voting Tabulator Anomalies:
In early voting, the more ballots a tabulator processed, the more predictably skewed the results became:
• At tabulators with <250 ballots, Trump and Harris showed reasonable variance.
• But above 250 ballots, results converged tightly around Trump 60%, Harris 40%, across the board.
.
.
.
3. Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania is where historical voting patterns were flipped on their head, and no one seems to be asking why.
Traditionally, urban centers like Philadelphia vote Democrat, and rural counties lean Republican, but in 2024, heavily Democrat precincts saw abnormally low turnout, while swing counties reported turnout higher than registered voter levels in some cases.
ETA flagged precincts where:
• Ballots cast exceeded 100% of registered voters.
• Votes for Trump outnumbered total ballots submitted, based on county reporting timelines.
• Tabulation errors were “corrected” days later with no audit trail.
Which people? Those of us who believed him when he said in 2016 “the election is rigged” and when on 1/19/25 he linked Musk’s being good with vote counting computers to his winning PA’s electoral votes? Or is it those who believe his claiming to have won Pennsylvania by a landslide? I hope the latter!
Even someone like me knew there was election interference but no one wanted to look into it. And why not? That is what I want to know. Now looking into the election interference especially with TACO and Musk admitting to it is moving very slowly.
I knew when the orange asshole was so cavalier in his screw-ups during his nazi rallies, that he KNEW he was going to win. The press or his minions didn't even try to cover up for his most ridiculous rants, or when he was slurring, or just plain acting a fool. He strutted around like he just KNEW he was going to win. But that of course, wasn't enough, so he added a couple of fake assassination attempts and one young kid lost his life and took it for the team.
Cheeto claimed interference when there was no substantiation of the claim It takes time to objectively review the data and statistically analyze the information b4 going off half cocked It's now becoming clear that the Nazis were elected illegally Cases coming forward
We ALL felt that, I think, on election day. More of a gut-punch than when he "won" the first time around. There was nothing indicating that he could catch up to Kamala's trajectory. At least, from where I sit (in the cheap seats). And these comments RJM mentions, below, were crystal clear to many of us. "He just admitted to fixing the election!".
From Cheeto's vantage point "one fix deserves another" especially if it kept him out of jail All his minions across the country given ways to affect the election The case that RandomHuman posted is an example moving forward of what is the first of more to come
I see others have raised the SMART Elections case in Rockland County. While on its face that case seems to be about the Democratic primary race, the far more disturbing implications are what the company that’s supposed to be ensuring the integrity of our voting systems, Pro V&V, did with the machines prior to the 2024 election. In addition, Pro V&V’s public facing website is being dismantled - or something - and for one of two major companies responsible for nearly the whole American election apparatus to go dark immediately following the 2024 election is alarming, to say the least.
Our voting apparatus is controlled by only a couple of companies, and these companies have very little meaningful oversight or accountability.
Before the 2024 election, Pro V&V made changes to the voting machine/tabulator software, along with other seriously concerning activities, and they called the changes “di minimus,” which would not trigger any review by election overseers.
I didn’t write these two substack articles below, but they are part of my research on the issue. I’ve been following the work of both the Election Truth Alliance and SMART Elections quite closely and just discovered this Pro V&V thing a couple of days ago.
Perhaps these resources about Pro V&V and other problems related to the 2024 elections (and potential rigging) will be of interest to everyone else who is concerned about the integrity of our voting systems.
2024 Election Subversion
Kathi Griffin and Don Lemon on his Substack show speculated that the Nazis rigged the 2024 election This conjecture is now beginning to gain traction as objective data supports concerns about the election results
It’s obvious that there was a lot riding on the election since the Orange Cheeto was running to keep his ass out of jail As we know now Cheeto will do anything to survive even if it means defrauding the American people in order to stay out of the hoosegow
First it was Greg Pallast investigative reporting of vigilante challenges to registered voters in order to disenfranchise 3.5M voters from voting that would have brought a win for Harris
Now the Election Truth Alliance(ETA) has shed even more light on election integrity with a sophisticated statistical deep dive into 2024 election These include how the Nazis were able to win all seven swing states which is a rare phenomenon Plotting out the precincts in swing states there is a consistent “comet effect” demonstrating voter data manipulation particularly on the day of the election This kind of graphic effect is seen in evaluation of Russian elections This coupled with Musk’s group expertise in hacking into Fed computer systems, it doesn’t take too much to suggest that vote tabulation tampering occurred
The Nazis should not be allowed to hold public office for at least 6y!!! Join the NO Kings June 14 Protest Keep the pressure on the fascists in government
Not to mention Trump admitting at his pre-inauguration rally on Jan 19 that Musk had hacked the voting computers and thus Trump won Pennsylvania. (And only a very naive person would think Pennsylvania was the only state that was affected.) Rep. Jasmine Crockett noticed, nj.com printed the story, rev.com has the transcript, but still too many people aren't aware of it, alas. Links:
https://www.nj.com/politics/2025/01/house-dem-questions-whether-trump-maga-billionaire-rigged-election-in-critical-swing-state.html
https://www.rev.com/transcripts/trump-rally-ahead-of-inaguration (time stamp 28:03)
Quote: "But [Musk] went out to Pennsylvania ... and he knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers, those vote-counting computers, and we ended up
winning Pennsylvania in a landslide. So it was pretty good. He's pretty good. So thank you to Elon."
Not a landslide [there you go again dissing the truth, Dodo] but also not what actual voters voted for.
thanks so much for the added information which is gradually accumulating and by the end of the year it will be a mountain that the Nazis will have to counter It will be a very interesting time for sure
Kdw is a troll freak spewing disinformation saying the government is poisoning our food. Sounds like a paranoid maggot.
Reported and blocked.
Is anyone investigating the election results in the swing states?
It's true the Democrats are resisting this as he says. When I first heard that I pulled back on my research on this. Then I thought, I know they don't want the hassle but they have to speak out. They cannot let this go by. Then it'll just happen again. SMART elections brought a case against Trump in Rockland county NY because of evidence, the interruption in the data pattern. And while Kirsten Gillibrand was reelected there, Kamala Harris got NO votes! The NY State supreme Court said there's enough evidence to move forward. Next court date is September 25. It was also in the Boulder Daily. But I hear that even if he's guilty, the election was certified and it can't be reversed. I'd like to know who said? This never happened before!!
The short answer is NO although a newer substack, Smart Elections, has been compiling the evidence. Maybe that, and the pile of unimaginable horrors that gets bigger and stinkier every day, will make people listen.
Historicall, as I see it, the Greed Party's continual assertions of election fraud (based on flimsy to zero evidence) convinced the Democrats that their position had to be that there was no election fraud anywhere at all ever. The statement "the election is rigged" at the 2016 debate was misinterpreted as an accusation with Democrats getting all defensive, when anyone who considered the source would take it for an admission that the rigging was being done for him because he can't think about anything that's not of personal interest.
After last November's election a group of computer scientists wrote a letter concerning anomalies in the tabulated votes that suggested substantial hacking but their ideas were ignored. So far, Democrats seem to be continuing to run away from the issue. It's disappointing (big understatement).
Yes, you can visit SMART elections or Election Truth Alliance websites. Also I wrote a Substack in April called "2024 Election: call for audits?", you can see what the evidence looks like in Nevada and Pennsylvania, initially.
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1jubiil/cmv_the_2024_election_could_have_been_stolen_and/
1. Trump’s Own Statements
On January 19, 2025, during a pre-inauguration rally in Washington, D.C., Donald Trump expressed gratitude towards Elon Musk for his support during the campaign, particularly in Pennsylvania. He stated:
“He journeyed to Pennsylvania where he spent a month and a half campaigning for me… and he’s a popular guy. He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.”
Then during a FIFA World Cup announcement, Trump veered from soccer talk to politics when reflecting on how the United States secured hosting rights during his first administration. "When we made this, it was made during my term, my first term, and it was so sad because I said, can you imagine, I'm not going to be President, and that's too bad," Trump said. "And what happened is they rigged the election and I became President, so that was a good thing."
Sure, Donald Trump is an idiot and says incoherent stuff all the time, but two incidents and one directly referencing the “vote-counting computers” do seem extremely fishy, especially given the work of the Election Truth Alliance or ETA.
.
.
.
2. Clark County, NV
Let’s move on to Nevada. The Election Truth Alliance analyzed the Cast Vote Records (CVR) from Clark County, raw voting machine data publicly available, and found multiple quantitative anomalies that demand answers.
a. Drop-Off Voting Discrepancy:
A “drop-off vote” is when someone votes for president but skips down-ballot races. This is normal, but here’s the twist:
• Trump had a +10.54% drop-off rate.
• Harris had just +1.07%.
That’s a 10X discrepancy. Why would Trump voters overwhelmingly skip Senate races but
Harris voters didn’t? That’s not just odd, it’s statistically glaring and does not line up with past trends from other swing states. In fact, in Pennsylvania in 2024, the drop-off rate was around 5% for Republicans, and in 2012, during the Obama v. Romney campaign, the drop-off was 6% for republicans. In other words, 10% is wildly high.
b. Early Voting Tabulator Anomalies:
In early voting, the more ballots a tabulator processed, the more predictably skewed the results became:
• At tabulators with <250 ballots, Trump and Harris showed reasonable variance.
• But above 250 ballots, results converged tightly around Trump 60%, Harris 40%, across the board.
.
.
.
3. Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania is where historical voting patterns were flipped on their head, and no one seems to be asking why.
Traditionally, urban centers like Philadelphia vote Democrat, and rural counties lean Republican, but in 2024, heavily Democrat precincts saw abnormally low turnout, while swing counties reported turnout higher than registered voter levels in some cases.
ETA flagged precincts where:
• Ballots cast exceeded 100% of registered voters.
• Votes for Trump outnumbered total ballots submitted, based on county reporting timelines.
• Tabulation errors were “corrected” days later with no audit trail.
.
.
.
Trump is a congenital liar. Why is it that so many people are sure he's telling the truth when he says something they want to believe?
Which people? Those of us who believed him when he said in 2016 “the election is rigged” and when on 1/19/25 he linked Musk’s being good with vote counting computers to his winning PA’s electoral votes? Or is it those who believe his claiming to have won Pennsylvania by a landslide? I hope the latter!
Even someone like me knew there was election interference but no one wanted to look into it. And why not? That is what I want to know. Now looking into the election interference especially with TACO and Musk admitting to it is moving very slowly.
I knew when the orange asshole was so cavalier in his screw-ups during his nazi rallies, that he KNEW he was going to win. The press or his minions didn't even try to cover up for his most ridiculous rants, or when he was slurring, or just plain acting a fool. He strutted around like he just KNEW he was going to win. But that of course, wasn't enough, so he added a couple of fake assassination attempts and one young kid lost his life and took it for the team.
An adult firefighter with a family was shot by that 'young kid', as well.
Cheeto claimed interference when there was no substantiation of the claim It takes time to objectively review the data and statistically analyze the information b4 going off half cocked It's now becoming clear that the Nazis were elected illegally Cases coming forward
The election was certified, Kamala Harris never asked for a recount and still hasn't.
So what?
https://www.morningstar.com/news/accesswire/1033118msn/2024-presidential-and-senate-results-called-into-question-as-lawsuit-advances
thanks for the legal perspective
Thank you!
We ALL felt that, I think, on election day. More of a gut-punch than when he "won" the first time around. There was nothing indicating that he could catch up to Kamala's trajectory. At least, from where I sit (in the cheap seats). And these comments RJM mentions, below, were crystal clear to many of us. "He just admitted to fixing the election!".
From Cheeto's vantage point "one fix deserves another" especially if it kept him out of jail All his minions across the country given ways to affect the election The case that RandomHuman posted is an example moving forward of what is the first of more to come
Where do the lawsuits stand now?
You ask all the right questions. Thank you. I hope someone will answer this one.
SMART elections is gathering evidence and they go to court on September 22
Hello!
I see others have raised the SMART Elections case in Rockland County. While on its face that case seems to be about the Democratic primary race, the far more disturbing implications are what the company that’s supposed to be ensuring the integrity of our voting systems, Pro V&V, did with the machines prior to the 2024 election. In addition, Pro V&V’s public facing website is being dismantled - or something - and for one of two major companies responsible for nearly the whole American election apparatus to go dark immediately following the 2024 election is alarming, to say the least.
Our voting apparatus is controlled by only a couple of companies, and these companies have very little meaningful oversight or accountability.
Before the 2024 election, Pro V&V made changes to the voting machine/tabulator software, along with other seriously concerning activities, and they called the changes “di minimus,” which would not trigger any review by election overseers.
I didn’t write these two substack articles below, but they are part of my research on the issue. I’ve been following the work of both the Election Truth Alliance and SMART Elections quite closely and just discovered this Pro V&V thing a couple of days ago.
Perhaps these resources about Pro V&V and other problems related to the 2024 elections (and potential rigging) will be of interest to everyone else who is concerned about the integrity of our voting systems.
Here’s one from SMART about Pro V&V: https://smartelections.substack.com/p/voting-machine-testing-lab-website
And here’s one from another author who expands upon the ProV&V website scandal, along with other anomalies: https://dissentinbloom.substack.com/p/the-machines-were-changed-before
We have to get the word out to as many people as possible.
In solidarity, Rebecca