If you rewatch the video, she explains that the judge has already stated his leaning towards "unconditional discharge", meaning conviction in name only, without actual consequences. At least in the history books, instead of just having been found guilty of crimes, he will forever be a "convicted" felon. Unless, of course, his lawyers request and get granted a stay of the sentencing.
If you rewatch the video, she explains that the judge has already stated his leaning towards "unconditional discharge", meaning conviction in name only, without actual consequences. At least in the history books, instead of just having been found guilty of crimes, he will forever be a "convicted" felon. Unless, of course, his lawyers request and get granted a stay of the sentencing.
If you rewatch the video, she explains that the judge has already stated his leaning towards "unconditional discharge", meaning conviction in name only, without actual consequences. At least in the history books, instead of just having been found guilty of crimes, he will forever be a "convicted" felon. Unless, of course, his lawyers request and get granted a stay of the sentencing.