In a fair world, he would. However, it sounds like the judge is favoring an "unconditional discharge", which means a sentence with no real consequences, other than carrying around the title of "convicted felon" now, and in the history books for all time. His lawyers can still seek a stay.
In a fair world, he would. However, it sounds like the judge is favoring an "unconditional discharge", which means a sentence with no real consequences, other than carrying around the title of "convicted felon" now, and in the history books for all time. His lawyers can still seek a stay.
In a fair world, he would. However, it sounds like the judge is favoring an "unconditional discharge", which means a sentence with no real consequences, other than carrying around the title of "convicted felon" now, and in the history books for all time. His lawyers can still seek a stay.