3 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Vau Geha's avatar

It ALREADY HAS HAPPENED.

In the second impeachment Congress has decided that Trump engaged in insurrection. The house passed articles of impeachment saying clearly that Trump engaged in insurrection, and in the trial, a majority of the senate voted yes on those articles of impeachment, just not the two thirds needed to remove him immediately.

Just nobody will enforce this decision.

Expand full comment
Leslie Jaszczak's avatar

Impeachment is the bringing of charges, but unfortunately he wasn't convicted in the trial. (Thanks, Moscow Mitch!) So that's like saying someone is guilty because they were charged with a crime even though they weren't convicted. They may be as guilty as sin but under the law they are not. God, after three of them in 30 years, I wish people would learn how impeachment works.

Expand full comment
Vau Geha's avatar

As I said it was not enough to remove Trump but it did fulfill the requirements the Supreme Court made for applying amendment 14,3.

Or seems that no one paid attention, otherwise Trump couldn't have been reelected.

Anyway, I'm not so sure that a president Vance would not be worse.

Expand full comment
ErrorError