The key of the majority order that rejected the violation stated a point I do not see covered. The court decision stated "RUN" which, to me, means that they can run, they just cannot "SERVE."That being said, I believe that this could be successfully argued, and overturned.
The key of the majority order that rejected the violation stated a point I do not see covered. The court decision stated "RUN" which, to me, means that they can run, they just cannot "SERVE."That being said, I believe that this could be successfully argued, and overturned.
The key of the majority order that rejected the violation stated a point I do not see covered. The court decision stated "RUN" which, to me, means that they can run, they just cannot "SERVE."That being said, I believe that this could be successfully argued, and overturned.