Trump Hates The Leakers
Trump’s FBI raid on a Washington Post journalist signals a new low: weaponizing law enforcement against reporters, threatening sources, and daring Americans to ignore the First Amendment’s warning.
I thought Donald Trump had already burned through the inventory of presidential firsts. After years of watching him treat norms as inconveniences, constitutional limits as obstacles, and accountability as betrayal, it was fair to assume there wasn’t much unexplored territory left. I was wrong.
This time, the line crossed wasn’t rhetorical; it was operational.
Federal agents, acting under his administration, showed up at the home of a Washington Post journalist and seized her electronic devices: phones, laptops, even a watch. Not because she was accused of a crime. Not because she was under investigation. She wasn’t.
She was told, plainly, she was not the target.
That distinction matters, and it’s precisely what makes this moment so dangerous.
This wasn’t a leaker being hauled off in cuffs. This wasn’t a spy thriller gone wrong. This was law enforcement agents entering the home of Hannah Natanson, a reporter whose job, whose constitutional role, is to tell the public what its government is doing. They searched her home. They took her devices. And then, with a straight face, told her she wasn’t the target.
If that sounds like something out of a banana republic with a flag and a strongman, congratulations; you’re paying attention.
I spent years inside Trump’s orbit. I don’t analyze this man from cable news panels or Twitter threads. I watched how he views power when no one is supposed to be looking. And this move, this raid, is pure Trumpian logic: intimidate first, justify later, and dare anyone to stop you. It’s not about one reporter. It’s about sending a message to every reporter.
The official line, delivered by Attorney General Pam Bondi, is that this was about classified information and national security. That the Pentagon asked for it. That the leaker is already behind bars. That the administration “will not tolerate illegal leaks.”
Fine. No one is arguing that classified information should be handled recklessly. But here’s the inconvenient truth the Trump administration would rather bulldoze than confront: journalists are not law enforcement auxiliaries. They are not extensions of the FBI. They are not evidence lockers for the state.
They are the free press. And the First Amendment doesn’t come with an asterisk that says unless the president is embarrassed.
Natanson wasn’t accused of a crime. The newspaper wasn’t told it was under investigation. Yet agents still rifled through her home and walked away with devices that likely contain years of confidential communications; sources who trusted her with their livelihoods, their careers, sometimes their safety. Over a thousand federal employees trusted her enough to speak. That trust just got put through a shredder.
This is why even former editors, press freedom groups, and First Amendment lawyers are sounding the alarm. Because once the government normalizes physical searches of journalists, the damage doesn’t stop at one raid. Sources dry up. Whistleblowers go silent. Reporters hesitate. Democracy suffocates quietly.
Trump has always despised the press, but not because it’s biased. He hates it because it’s independent. Because it doesn’t swear loyalty oaths. Because it doesn’t kneel. To him, journalists aren’t citizens performing a civic duty; they’re adversaries to be crushed, delegitimized, or—now—searched.
What makes this moment especially grotesque is its timing and context. Natanson covers the federal workforce during Trump’s second term; firing sprees, policy rewrites, institutional hollowing. She’s described the work as brutal, nearly breaking her. That’s not a coincidence. That’s the pressure campaign working as designed.
And let’s dispense with the fantasy that this is about a narrow warrant executed with surgical precision. When you seize a reporter’s devices, you don’t just grab files related to one contractor. You vacuum up everything. Conversations unrelated to any investigation. Notes. Drafts. Source lists. That’s not law enforcement minimalism; that’s informational overreach with a badge.
This is what illiberal regimes do. They don’t ban the press outright; they make reporting so dangerous, so invasive, so legally precarious that only the reckless or the obedient remain. They wrap intimidation in legal language and call it order.
The Washington Post, for all its internal contradictions and billionaire owner politics, is right to call this “highly unusual and aggressive.” Because it is. And because if this becomes normal, the press doesn’t just lose; it becomes ornamental.
Trump once said the press is “the enemy of the people.” This raid is what it looks like when a president starts acting on that belief; not rhetorically, but operationally.
The Founders didn’t enshrine press freedom because it was polite. They did it because it was dangerous; to tyrants. The moment journalists are treated like suspects simply for doing their jobs is the moment the First Amendment stops being a shield and starts being a suggestion.
Every raid, every seizure, every intrusion is simply Trump seeing how much of the republic he can take while still calling it America.
I HAVE NO TIME FOR DISTRACTIONS FROM THE HATERS.
HELP ME TO CONTINUE TO GROW OUR COMMUNITY.
AND, PLEASE SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISTS…
SUBSCRIBE. READ. LIKE. RESTACK.
Yeah, I know; you’re tired. This shit is exhausting.
Guess what? Me too.
But I’ve spent the last 8 years throwing punches in the dark so truth could get a little daylight. And now I’m asking you to step into the ring with me.
Because if you’re still reading this, you already get it:
This isn’t just a newsletter. It’s a rally cry. A war drum. A line in the sand.
We are not passive observers of the downfall. We are the resistance. We call out the liars. We drag corruption by the collar into the sunlight. We say the quiet parts out loud; and we don’t flinch.
But here’s the truth: I can’t do this solo. Not anymore.
The storm is already here. We are standing in it. And it’s wearing stars and stripes like camouflage, preaching “freedom” while it sells fascism at retail.
So let me ask you:
Are. You. In?
Because this is not a scroll-and-forget read. This is a living, breathing, fire-breathing movement; and movements don’t move unless you do.
We need to be louder than spin, tougher than propaganda, and impossible to gaslight.
That takes more than clicks. More than likes.
It takes skin in the game.
So if you believe truth matters; if you’re sick of the bullshit, if you’re ready to stop screaming into the algorithm and start pushing back with purpose, this is your next step.
HERE’S HOW YOU PUT YOUR FOOT ON THE GAS:
Become a paid subscriber. Fund fearless, unfiltered journalism that hits back.
Share this with the loudest people you know; the ones who never sit down and shut up.
Build the community. Amplify the message. Be the damn megaphone.
And yeah; Founding Members? The first 240 of you will get a signed, numbered, limited-edition Substack version of Revenge. That’s not just a collector’s item. That’s receipts. Proof you didn’t sit this one out.
But let’s be clear:
This isn’t about a book.
It’s about backbone.
It’s about calling out the gaslighters and refusing to be played.
It’s about locking arms and saying, “Not. On. Our. Watch.”
You want to make a difference?
Then make it; right now.
Because if we don’t fight for truth, no one will.
But if we fight together?
They can’t drown us out.
Let’s be so loud, they wish we were just angry tweets.
Let’s be unshakable.
Unignorable.
Un-fucking-breakable.
Let’s go!







Trump IS a LEAKER..everytime he opens his demented mouth !! 🙄
Invoking The Insurrection Act Does NOT Prevent Peaceful Protests
Cheeto the malgnant narcissist bully strongman believes he will intimidate people from protessting Invoking the act does NOT stop people exercising their first amendment rights
Everybody has their level....if uncomfortable then don't protest Find other ways to protest ie calling congress people, attending Indivisible meetings etc etc But it's all about intimidation....case in point, an ICE goon said to a protester "y'all didn't learn from Renee Good did ya?"