181 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Joanna Byrd's avatar

I might consider subscribing if Meidas became less "National Enquirer" and more facts-based. I usually pass on the sensationalized headlines of how great the Meidas Mighty are. Pass along real news & lose the drama.

Expand full comment
Jessica Reynolds's avatar

I think sensationalized headlines are the only way to counter the right wing headlines. It's why left leaning news doesn't get in front of voters, and hasn't for years. This is clearly working.

Expand full comment
MrsCQ's avatar

This is what I truly don't understand. Don't trust MeidasTouch? Find them to sensationalize headlines? Find them hypocritical? You know what you can do? Unsubscribe. It saves you the time of scrolling away but that works as well. .

Expand full comment
Lynn Arthur's avatar

Wow. I guess the First Amendment only counts when you agree. 🤔

Expand full comment
Flygirl61's avatar

Or, you can just scroll away

Expand full comment
S Brown's avatar

Yes, that's what I do. Leave the hyperbole to the traitors

Expand full comment
Donna Rerecich's avatar

Wow, more fact based? Where would you go for more fact based news?

Expand full comment
Lynn Arthur's avatar

1) The Bulwark is excellent. Many of their pundits have worked with the GOP and MAGA. 2) Brian Tyler Cohen. 3) David Pakman. 4) Jesse Dollemore. 5) Glenn Kirschner. 6) Occupy Democrats. 7) Hal Sparks. He’s a comedian who’s also well informed about politics.

Expand full comment
Lynn Arthur's avatar

Hi Joanna. You replied negatively to my comment about MTN’s censorship of their Substack content for low-income followers, and yet you criticized them for being not fact-based and more similar to the National Enquirer 🤔 Perhaps read my reply to mad-as-hell “Gary” for clarification. Or not.

Expand full comment
Donna Rerecich's avatar

Can't see Gary.

Expand full comment
ErrorError