46 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Donna's avatar

Now charges should be filed against him.

Expand full comment
Jill's avatar

Exactly! As the judgement said, “he broke the law”. As a convicted felon, he should be charged accordingly. Now let’s get that group of judges to weigh in on his illegal deportation of immigrants without due process of the law! And while they’re at it, let’s get to the illegal actions of the 🤡for accepting bribes from terrorists countries and for using the presidency to further enrich himself and his family.

START RENOVATING ALCATRAZ!! He wants the $400 million dollar plane for himself,…we can arrange for him to have his own private island along with it! ✈️🏝️⚖️🇺🇸

Expand full comment
Keith Olson's avatar

I think Trump should trade places with Kilmar Abrego Garcia in El Salvador. That would be Justice Delivered.

Expand full comment
Jill's avatar

Justice would be, to have brought Kilmar Abrego Garcia back when the JUDGE ORDERED HIM TO!

Expand full comment
MM Harris's avatar

brilliant.

Expand full comment
Sandra Blessman's avatar

I agree

Expand full comment
Beth Witrogen's avatar

Sing it!

Expand full comment
Beth Witrogen's avatar

Sorry, we don’t. Want him anywhere near the SF Bay Area.

Expand full comment
Jill's avatar

Fair enough.

Expand full comment
Sandra Blessman's avatar

Understood and don’t blame you

Expand full comment
Susan Raquel's avatar

Amen to that, leave him on the East Coast. LOL

Expand full comment
Beth Witrogen's avatar

preferably in the middle of the Atlantic ... you guys don't need his stink either.

Expand full comment
Dee Joy's avatar

Yes exactly. Round up this rogue regime and maga, dump them all on Alcatraz. They can all live in chaos together and leave the rest of us alone.

Expand full comment
Terina Wills's avatar

Not Alcatraz! More like Gitmo! That would be a dream come true 😜

Expand full comment
Jill's avatar

How about the gulag in El Salvador!!

Expand full comment
Beth Witrogen's avatar

Or Libya, Sudan ... Siberia?

Expand full comment
Beth Witrogen's avatar

yes, keep him away from the SF Bay Area!

Expand full comment
Sandra Blessman's avatar

Yes 😂 I second that

Expand full comment
MM Harris's avatar

We don't want any of them in the Bay Area.... (but on a practical side...studies done long ago over the years have shown it would be prohibitively expensive to rehab that prison... building are falling apart & would probably need to be scrapped / rebuilt. . cells and more no longer meet safety and other more modern regulations; no sewage system (the original one was to dump it into the bay!!!!); PLUS everything needs to be transported by boat, back and forth. ... just to nip the "upgrade/utilize it again" concept in the bud..)

Expand full comment
Sylvia Arrowood's avatar

Remember it was an unconditional discharge. That means he is still a felon and the charges can be brought up at a later time.

You are going to spoil Alcatraz by sending him and his lemmings there. The stench would be constantly there. Better to have him removed to Qatar.

Expand full comment
Beth Witrogen's avatar

Thank you Sylvia, we in the Bay Area agree.

Expand full comment
Sandra Blessman's avatar

Another good thought maybe they would you know treat him as they should. Off with his head

Expand full comment
Suzanne Karbowska-Hayes's avatar

I Hope your euphoria isn’t a bit premature. This snake oil salesman manages to wriggle out of every tight corner so far.

Expand full comment
Brenda Crissinger's avatar

Agree - but it seems the worst things look for him the madder he gets with rage and it seems to make it even worse sometimes., i.e. the pardoning of criminals, etc. His response is always revenge, revenge, revenge.

Expand full comment
MM Harris's avatar

and I still wonder how the immunity ruling could play out...

Expand full comment
Sandra Blessman's avatar

Oh I like that idea. So ordered

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
May 29Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
WJB Motown's avatar

TACO BOY suffers from untreatable, no cure possible Brain Fog

Expand full comment
Marcia King's avatar

Due to the Supreme Court ruling about having immunity while President, I’m not sure he would be prosecuted. However, he cannot KEEP assuming more power than he has. Tbh, I still can’t believe the Supreme Court EVER extended presidential powers so far.

Expand full comment
Jill's avatar

He keeps shoveling that meme coin money to Thomas and Alito!

Clarence Thomas needs to be convicted!

Expand full comment
Sandra Blessman's avatar

I fully agree. I can’t believe how many sickos are in the world

Expand full comment
Miriambis's avatar

It seems that SCOTUS is quite aware this orange scumbag has profoundly abused his powers and I wish they’d reverse that fucking asinine presidential “immunity” he currently has! They’ll probably say he was “unaware” he violated Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution as a Pres. act he committed!

Expand full comment
Sarah Godbey's avatar

Biden should have taken advantage of this ruling. He could have done something to stop him and we wouldn't be going down this road.

I love Biden, but putting Garland in to slow walk trump's convictions also was also a bad call.

Sometimes you cannot hire a leader that is too 'By the book' and thinks with his heart, but the alternative at the time was this evil SOB

We need a fighter with a strong legal background and conviction that stays the course to quash the unconstitutional flood of damage 💔

Expand full comment
Joe Jabroni's avatar

"Garland slow walking" is a pervasive narrative but I think it's important to take this into context:

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/merrick-garland-isnt-blame-delays-trumps-election-interference-case-rcna141213

For example:

"The delays created by Covid, use of encryption, attorney-client and executive privilege claims were unavoidable, even for the most obvious evidence. Take the tweet Trump sent at 2:24 p.m. Jan. 6: “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage.” It was right there in public! But to present that in court first required the exploitation of at least two phones, nine months of fights over executive privilege, a 23-day stall from Twitter and two sets of interviews with at least eight different top aides. "

Expand full comment
Sandra Blessman's avatar

Yes totally agree

Expand full comment
patti smith's avatar

You're not alone there!

Expand full comment
Dee Joy's avatar

He ignores the courts. He plans to get rid of them and crown himself king. Who will enforce the ruling?

Expand full comment
Jill's avatar

WE, THE PEOPLE!!!

Expand full comment
Sandra Blessman's avatar

Yes even if we have to drag them all out of the WH. We the people more of us

Expand full comment
WJB Motown's avatar

Malcolm Nance called out for every Kamala voter to protest in June. That would make it the biggest protest in US history with 35 million people.

The People will enforce democracy.

Expand full comment
Sandra Blessman's avatar

Yes yes yes great plan

Expand full comment
Joseph L Hallock's avatar

Before criminal charges are filed, everybody who has suffered from his illegal actions should file civil cases and drain him of all of his wealth. Then we can finish him off for his crimes. But the civil cases will go much better if they go first. I know this from first hand experience against con men.

Expand full comment
Judy Cross's avatar

Can he be sued for the civil cases because of his immunity that SCOTUS gave him like a Christmas present, wrapped in a big red bow?

Expand full comment
Joseph L Hallock's avatar

It’s my understanding that the Supreme Court gave Trump protection from criminal prosecution. That does not cover civil cases which is exactly why I changed my effort to recover funds stolen from my parents. And, if you look at the hundreds of lawsuits against Trump now, they are civil lawsuits.

None of the lawsuits against Trump have been thrown out because of his protection granted by the Supreme Court. That’s because they are not criminal claims, so I believe that he is still liable in civil court.

Expand full comment
Judy Cross's avatar

I sure hope you are right. Thanks for info.

Expand full comment
Joseph L Hallock's avatar

Just understand that I am not a lawyer. But when I began the process of going after a con man locally, I was finally advised by the criminal prosecutors to go to a civil case and it was the best advice I ever had. We beat the criminals at their scam. Civil court rules are very different than criminal court rules. It was so much easier!

Expand full comment