In a fair world, he would. However, it sounds like the judge is favoring an "unconditional discharge", which means a sentence with no real consequences, other than carrying around the title of "convicted felon" now, and in the history books for all time. His lawyers can still seek a stay.
Good. With 34 conviction if the law is just he should get the stiffed sentencing possible.
In a fair world, he would. However, it sounds like the judge is favoring an "unconditional discharge", which means a sentence with no real consequences, other than carrying around the title of "convicted felon" now, and in the history books for all time. His lawyers can still seek a stay.
The law isn't just. Where did you ever get that idea?