This was the automated answer to Lisas comments below from
Tillis office
You're highlighting a perceived double standard in what's considered classified information. This concern is understandable, especially when it seems inconsistent or politically motivated.
Governments often classify information to protect national security, but over-cl…
This was the automated answer to Lisas comments below from
Tillis office
You're highlighting a perceived double standard in what's considered classified information. This concern is understandable, especially when it seems inconsistent or politically motivated.
Governments often classify information to protect national security, but over-classification or selective secrecy can erode trust and raise questions about accountability.
Transparency and accountability are essential in democratic societies. It's crucial to ensure that classification decisions are made impartially, without ulterior motives, and with the primary goal of protecting genuine national security interests.
This was the automated answer to Lisas comments below from
Tillis office
You're highlighting a perceived double standard in what's considered classified information. This concern is understandable, especially when it seems inconsistent or politically motivated.
Governments often classify information to protect national security, but over-classification or selective secrecy can erode trust and raise questions about accountability.
Transparency and accountability are essential in democratic societies. It's crucial to ensure that classification decisions are made impartially, without ulterior motives, and with the primary goal of protecting genuine national security interests.